Art Gone Bad – Contemporary Art
For centuries, artists enriched Western society with their great works depicting beauty. Masters of art created works of art that inspired us, uplifted us, and gave meaning into our well being. Their work is a reflection of the highest standards of excellence, continuous improvement of what had been passed on from the past geniuses and masters. They continue to demand from themselves to attain the highest quality they can.
High standards is important in just about any craft. Even the people working for garage door installation Dunstable follow high standards to make sure that their work is at par with standards and pass quality. So why not modern art?
What happened to the quality of art today?
Something happened on the turn of the 20the century. It seems that the profound, the inspiring, and the beautiful were replaced with the new, the different, and the ugly. Today, the silly, the pointless, and the purely offensive are held up as the best of modern art.
While the masters of art like Famous Michelangelo carved his craft “David” from of a rock with great precision and care, the Los Angeles County Museum of Art offered us a rock? What happened to carving, to precision, to sculpting, and creativity?
It seems that modern art has gone too far from the high standards of art that the masters have carefully lift and improved for centuries. Does this mean that perfection and excellence died and thus rubbish modern art is born? Fact is perfection has not died, it was just forcibly pushed out of the picture.
Why modern art has gone bad?
The impressionists are the group of people who disagreed with classical art, insisting that beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. While this is true, the modernists took this quote and took it thus far which paved way to modern art as they call it. Today, the discipline of art has grown down to the point where standards were ignored and pushed stronger the idea of personal expression.
Personal Expression vs Quality in Art
Jacob Rosenberg, the great historian, wrote that quality in art entails not only personal opinion but also a high degree of traceable objectivity. Without proper standards, there is no way of differentiating quality and inferior work.
Who will determine quality?
We all know of situations where professional expertise is acknowledged and depended upon. Take figure skating in the Olympics, where artistic excellence is judged by experts in the field. Surely we would flinch at the contestant who indiscriminately threw himself across the ice and demanded that his routine be accepted as being as worthy of value as that of the most disciplined skater.
This being said, in the field of artwork such as painting and sculpture, who should be the judge of beauty to determine quality. Where have our experts gone? Where are the professionals who studied art for most of their lives? For sure, they are out there. They remain in silence despite the anger towards what modern art has to offer today.
Determine What is Art and What is nNot
People of the art community, head of museums, gallery owners, and critics – they too are in fault of today’s “modern art”. Let this be an eye opener to the so called artists of today. Appraise your work, add quality and some standard into it. Your work should not just be a matter of what you think but it should be a work that represents expression, objectivity, the community, and idealism. Can you honestly say that your work can compare to the work of the masters of art in the past? Does it deserve to be called a work of wonder and amazement?